{"id":7492,"date":"2012-04-04T23:44:21","date_gmt":"2012-04-04T23:44:21","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.homeobook.com\/?p=7492"},"modified":"2022-01-05T01:10:11","modified_gmt":"2022-01-05T01:10:11","slug":"kents-repertory-a-comprehensive-study","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.homeobook.com\/kents-repertory-a-comprehensive-study\/","title":{"rendered":"Kent\u2019s Repertory – a Comprehensive Study"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"Kent3\"<\/a>Dr Sanchoo Balachandran<\/strong><\/p>\n

Origin of the Repertory in General\u00a0 <\/strong>
\nNeed for repertory arises from the very beginning of the introduction of the system. As the years passed, the literatures on materiamedica accumulate beyond the scope human brain, so need for an indexing is highlighted.<\/p>\n

The idea of repertory was first brought by Dr Hahnemaan himself<\/strong>, and the first repertory was born in 1805 itself as \u201cFragmenta de viribus medicamentorum positivis\u201d, the first part contain the symptoms observed and the second part contain the index or the repertory. Hahnemann was the first to make repertory and he was using a repertory for his daily practice. He had four volumes for this reference book consisting of 4239 pages. In 1817 he published a short repertory in Latin, more over in Materia Medica Pura he demonstrated two cases which gives one about his concept. In the preamble of material medica also he wrote about the concept of repertorisation. By around 1829 he arranged Dr Ernest Ferdinand Ruckert to arrange a repertory of the remedies, but was not successful and has remained to its manuscript form, housed now in Haele\u2019s museum in Robert Bosch Hospital, stuttgart, West Germany.<\/p>\n

In 1830 \u201332 Hahnemann compiled a repertory which he could not published because he himself found the work imperfect and his publisher Mr Arnold was not in a position to publish it. 1834-Dr Hahnemann employed Dr.Jahr to complete the second edition of chronic disease and also to lay foundations for a repertory and encyclopedia of symptoms. The repertory was published in 1835, was in German, and consists of two volumes of 1052 and 1254 pages respectively. This was followed by a third repertory on gland bones mucus membrane, ducts and skin diseases in 200 pages. Hahnemann further continued with his ideas on repertory but his later repertories remained and still in manuscript form.<\/p>\n

One of the first repertories was by Dr.Harthlaub published in 1828 in Leipzig. Hahnemanns pupil Dr Gross compiled a repertory consisting of two volumes which never appeared in print. In 1830 Weber compiled in German a repertory consisting of 536 pages,\u201dSystematische Darstellung de Antipsoriche Arzneimittal\u201d with a repertory of deterotion and amelioration in health rainging from top to toe of the subject and ending up with sleep and mental symptoms.<\/p>\n

The important Repertories with the year of publication
\n1. 18<\/strong>32 Boenninghausen\u2019s Repertory of the Anti-Psorics with a preface by Hahnemann. He was consider as the \u201cFather of Repertory\u201d
\n2. 1833 Glazor, First Alphabetical Pocket Repertory, 165 pages. published at Leipzig
\n3. 1833 Weber Peschier Repertory of purely pathagnomic effects, 376 pages prefaced by Hahnemann.
\n4. 1835 Boenninghausen Repertory of medicines which are not antipsoric.
\n5.1836 Bonninghause An attempt at showing the relative kinship of Homoeopathic remedies.(Verwandschaften Repertorium)
\n6. 1837 Rouff, A repertory published at Stuttgart. 236 pages.
\n7. 1843 Laffitte One of the first Persian Homoeopath, A Homoeopathic Repertory of Symptamatology. 975 pages. ( First original Repertory in French)
\n8. 1845 Boenninghausens Therapeutic Pocket Book.
\n9. 1845 Rouff A repertory of Nosology, 250 pages.
\n10. 1847 Hempel\u2019s Bonninghausen, 500 pages.
\n11. 1848 Cloffer Muller Systemic Alphabetical Repertory, 940 pages.
\n12. 1849 Mure Rio de Janeiro, 367 pages.
\n13. 1851 Bryanth an Alphabetical Repertory 352 pages.
\n14. 1853 Possart Repertory of charetersied Homoeopathic remedies, 700 pages published in Cothen.
\n15. 1854 A. Lippe. Repertory of comparative materiamedica. 144 pages.
\n16.\u00a01859 Cipher Repertory by English Homoeopaths, 600 pages. Enlarged edition in
\n17.\u00a01878, containing 1030 pages by Drydale, Atkins Dudgeon and Strokes.
\n18. 1873 Berridge Repertory of eyes published in England.
\n19. 1874 Grainer of Nimes Homeolexicon in two volumes.
\n20. 1879 C.Lippe Repertory of more charetersticed symptoms of the materiamedica 322 pages.
\n21. 1880 T.F.Allens Symptom register.
\n22. 1881 Hering\u2019s alphabetical repertory.
\n23. 1890 Gentry The repertory of concordance in six volumes, 5500 pages.
\n24. 1896 Knerr\u2019s Repertory to Herings guiding symptoms.
\n25. 1897 Kents 1st edition 1349 pages.
\n26. 1904 Clarke A clinical Repertory
\n27. 1905 Boger Boenninghausen\u2019s Characteristic And Repertory.
\n28. 1931 Boger Repertory with synoptic key.
\n29. 1927 Boericke Clinical Repertory.
\n30. 1937 Robert Sensation as if.
\n31. 1959 Dr. Jugal kishore Card repertory.
\n32. 1982 Barthel And Will Klunker Synthetic Repertory.
\n33. 1987 Dr.Ferderic Schroynes Synthesis Repertory
\n34. 1993 Robin Murphy N.D. Homoeopathic Medical Repertory.
\n35. The Complete Repertory.<\/p>\n

Apart from this, lot of regional repertories where also published during this period. For example Repertory of tongue by Dougles, 1896; Repertory of eyes by Berridge, 1873; Repertory of fevers by H.C.Allen, 1880; etc.<\/p>\n

Sources Of Kent\u2019s Repertory
\n<\/strong>By the end of 19th century, even though a lot of repertories where published all of them lack flexibility in one or other aspect. The work of the purist were too rigid and lacked the elasticity of Bonninghausens pocket book, but the latter was found at times leading to ridicules conclusions. Hence the work of Lippe, Lee and Kent were born.<\/p>\n

Dr. Kent worked on Dr. Lee\u2019s work; that is, he was preparing a repertory on the basis of Dr Lippe\u2019s manuscript for the second edition of his repertory. Dr Lippe\u2019s repertory in turn developed from the Repertory to the Manuel of Allen-Town Academy and this Repertory was developed out of Boenninghausen\u2019s Repertory of the Anti Psoric Remedies. Kent began where others had left. Kent\u2019s work is only a desirable extension of Boenninghausens\u2019 and is complimentary to it. He has absorbed almost all of Boenninghausen except generalization of locations, concomitants and modalities of particulars. He has particular rized them as Boenninghausen had done in his earlier works. Kent lifted boldly Boenninghausen\u2019s sensations and incorporated in his generalities. Most of the Boenninghausen\u2019s modalities were also included.<\/p>\n

Dr.Kent held that repertory was only a compilation at best and all reliable symptoms were the property of homoeopaths . He gathered together all that was in the earlier repertories,symptoms recorded in the fundamental works of the materia medica and added his own notes and notes of other practitioers. He verified the symptoms as far as possible and unverified symptoms were omited and on other hand clinical verifications have given importance, if they are found to be in consistant with the nature of the remedy. Drs. Gladwin , Milton, Powel, Mary Ives and Arthur Allen helped him.
\nDr Lee c<\/strong>ompleted the chapters Mind and Head directly, where as chapter\u2019s Eyes and Vision; and Urinary organs,chill, fever, and sweat. by Dr Kent.<\/p>\n

Land Marks of Kents Repertory\u00a0 <\/strong>
\n1st edition \u2013 1897, it was published in sections and was compiled in 1899
\n2nd edition \u2013 1908
\n3rd edition \u20131916\u00a0 Dr, Kent passed of in the year 1916
\n4th edition \u20131935 was published by Dr. Ethrhart with the help of\u00a0 Dr Gladvin and Dr. J.S.Pugh.
\n5th edition –1945
\n6th edition \u2013 1957 the American edition, 1961 Indian edition.
\n7th edition \u2013 Dr P. Schmith combined the Indian edition and American edition ( generally called as revised first edition.)<\/p>\n

Modification on Kent’s repertory.
\n<\/strong>1.Synthetic repertory<\/strong> is published in the year 1982, by Br Barthel and Dr Klunker, in three volumes but only the general chapters, that is the Mind, Generalities, Sleep, Dreams, Male genitalia, Female genitalia are made and suggest Kents repertory for the reference of particulars.<\/p>\n

2.Synthesis,<\/strong> Repertorium Homoeopathicum Syntheticum in 1987, edited by Dr.Frederik Schroynes. Synthesis is the enlarged edition of Kents repertory liked to the homoeopathic soft ware program Radar.The quality of the repertory is mainted by the following guide lines.
\ni) Repeatedly checked additions
\nii) Corrections to Kents Repertory
\niii) Clearly readable symptom format
\niv) The structure of the symptom is made more transpernt.
\nv) Consistant combined modalites
\nvi) Spcefic order for the group of symptoms were followed.
\nvii) Leading Words have being positioned in the front.
\nviii) Insuffecitently symptoms were completed on the basis materiamedica.
\nix) Ambiguous words have been clarified.
\nx) Global super rubrics been created
\nxi) Similar rubrics were mearged into one.
\nxii) Symptoms were split into meaning ful bits.
\nxiii) Language of the repertory has been completely revised.<\/p>\n

3.Homeopathic Medical Repertory<\/strong> by Robin Murphy; All the Kents repertory and sections of Kneers repertory were used as the foundation for building the repertory and all together 55 authors were taken in. All together 67 chapters, mordern terminologies were incorporated, 39000 new rubrics, 200000 additions.<\/p>\n

4. Kents Repertory of Homoeopathic Materia Medica Expanded<\/strong> by Dr. P.Shivaraman published in the year 1994, running edition is the reprint of the third edition.The important changes made are
\ni) Page numbers for the cross referanse
\nii) \u201c\u2014\u201cor the sub rubrics were added as followed by Dr. Lippe in his repertory. This is to avoid mis allintment.
\niii) The sub rubrics are in bold roman, to get a better clarity.
\niv) Separate chapter heading for Female Genetali is given.
\nv) Corrections for the alphabetical order for the rubrics and medicines were made., few changes were made to the abbreviations of the remedies.
\nvi) Time modalities are made to follow AM. And PM.<\/p>\n

5. Kunzli Repertory.
\n<\/strong>6. Additions to Kents Repertory of Homoeopathic material medica by George Vithoulkas<\/strong> reprinted in 1993. The additions were originally derived from a varity of sourses, including Boger, several Materia Medica and personal editions derived from cured cases.
\n7. Additions to Kents repertory C.M. Boger, <\/strong>
\n8. Kents comparative repertory of Homoeopathic Materia Medica by Dr. Dockx and Dr.G.Kokelenberg.\u00a0 <\/strong>
\n9. Bowel nosodes in the pages of Kents Repertory by Dr. Namitha Mohanthy. Published in the year 1998.
\n<\/strong>
\nPhilosophical Back Ground\u00a0 <\/strong>
\nKent’s repertory was based on philosophy of deductive logic that is from generals to particular. Dr, Kent divide the symptoms in there higherarche as General Symptoms, which is dived into Mind and Physical; particular symptoms; Common symptoms. The repertory is constructed in such a way that every case can be worked out from general to particular. The advantage of such a process is that the remedies, which have a particular symptom, may not have a specific modality, which is needed for the case. In that case if, you work out only with a particular sub rubric, you are at the risk of missing out a remedy which may in fact till that point of time may be an unobserved modality of that drug. So it is advisable to work the case with a general rubric and differentiate the remedies on the basis of sub rubric if it is applicable, but one should not bothered much about the presence of the drug selected in the sub rubrics needed. Thus one of the objective of this repertory is to select general group of remedies for the particular case.
\n
\nPlan and Construction<\/strong>
\nThe plan of the repertory is uniform through out and it is following Generals to particular, and it is arranged so that one can expand its literature as the years and experience accumulates.
\nChapters consists of location or Function are arranged on the basis of Hahnemann order that is to start with Mind, followed by Vertigo, head etc and to the last Generalities. All together there are 37 chapters.
\nEach chapter consists of related Rubrics which represents the symptoms, not the locations or organs generally, When pathological rubrics are given, it contain only leading drugs for the condition refereed. They are arranged from generals to particulars, in the alphabetical order.<\/p>\n

Rubrics are of two types
\n<\/strong>1. Main or general Rubrics
\n2. Sub Rubrics.
\nMain rubrics consist of all the respective drugs (that are the drugs, which covers that particular symptom in general), irrespective of the modifying factors. And they are arranged in the alphabetical order. Cross referanse are also given along appropriate rubrics so that one can look into the related rubrics.
\nSub Rubrics are related to the modifying factors of the respective Main rubric and arranged in a particular manner introduced by Dr.Jahr. As
\n1. Side. ( right then left)
\n2. Time.
\n1. Circumstances. Arranged in the order ailments from, alternating with and factors aggravating and amelurating.
\n2. Extension.(given under the point from which a certain symptoms extends, never under the the point to which extents.)
\n3. Sub locations.
\nThe above said is again repeated.
\nCross-reference<\/strong> is given whenever it was thought to be needed, and one can add further.
\nDrugs<\/strong> are represented by abbrevesions, as introduced by Dr. Hahnemaan. In total there are 648 drugs.
\nThe drugs are of three Gradings. \u00a0 <\/strong>
\nWell proved, clinically verified drugs \u2013 Represented in Bold, those symptoms produced by majority of provers and frequently verified.
\n1. Occasionally proved drugs \u2013 Represented in italics produced by few provers and occasionally verifed
\n2. Only in small group of provers \u2013 Represented in roman
\nThe grading of the drugs will help in easy and fast repertorisation with out compromising results.<\/p>\n

How to Work out A Case with Kent\u2019s Repertory\u00a0 <\/strong>
\nIn his preface to the repertory Dr.Kent emphasis that after taking the case following the guide lines laid down by Dr. Hahnemann in his Organon of Medicine aphorisms 83 to 140, one should write all the mental symptoms and all the conditions predicted of the patient himself and search the repertory for the symptoms corresponding to those. Then search for such physical symptoms as are predicted of the blood, color of discharge, and bodily aggravations, and amelioration that include the whole being, then desires like open air etc, then individualize still further using the symptoms predicted for the organs, functions and sensations, always give an prime importance to the time of occurrence, Then examine the symptom pricture collectively and individually. And lastly go to the materia medica for further clarification of the remedies. So essentially it consists of the following steps.
\n1. Case taking
\n2. Evaluation or grading of symptoms
\nWe should treat the patient as a whole. The symptoms are breaked into
\na) Mental Generals. Among them the higher arche followed is
\n1. Love hates
\n2. Intellect
\n3. Memory.
\nb) Physical generals, here the importance is given in the following order
\n1. Related to blood, color of discharge, Aversions and Cravings
\n2. Menstrual functions (general aggravations related to menses, the character of menses)
\n3. Environmental factors<\/p>\n

c) Particular symptoms, here the higher arche followed is
\n1. Peculiar or unusual symptoms
\n2. Discharges
\n3. Modalities<\/p>\n

d) Common symptoms\u2014they become important when they are absent or when intensified_
\n3. Conversion of symptoms to rubrics.
\n4. Erecting the reportorial totality.
\n5. Repertorisation proper. One can adopt repertorisation in two ways
\n1. Addition method
\n3. Elimination method
\n6. Analysis and prescription.<\/p>\n

MIND
\nIntroduction: <\/strong>
\nThis particular chapter contains rubrics related to constitution, psychopathological conditions, memory and modalities (e.g., closing eyes, conversation etc.)
\nRubrics related to the speech is dived into the chapters Mind \u2013 Mouth _ Larynx. This division can be easily understood as when the quality of the speech is altered ( symptoms of the higher center involvement ) you should look into chapter mind, when the motor functions are involved you should look into the chapter Mouth, when the quality of the voice is altered one should look into the chapter Larynx.<\/p>\n

Important word [r1]\u00a0meaning \u00a0 <\/strong>
\nFrivolous = Not serious
\nConsciences = Your own feeling whether you are doing right or wrong
\nTrifles = Some thing that is of little value or importance
\nArdent = Showing strong feeling
\nAudacity = Boldness
\nBenevolence = Kind , friendly.
\nBewildred = Confuse.
\nConfining = secretive
\nConfounding = To mix up
\nConscientious = Care full
\nContrary =Obstinate
\nCowardice = Lack of courage.
\nGrotesque = strange or unnatural in a way that is funny or frightening.
\nDeed full = Some thing that you do in action.
\nDefiant = Refusal to obey
\nDisconcerted = Dissatisfied.
\nEccentricity = Strange or unusual behavior.
\nEnnui = Strong hatred or dislike.
\nFastidious = want every thing to be clean and tidy.
\nFrivolous = Not serious
\nFrown = Draw in the bow inorder to show dissatisfaction.
\nGrimaces = Fascial expression to show that some thing is hurting you.
\nImbecility = Stupid
\nImperious = Commanding
\nImpetuous = Impulsive
\nImprudence = Rude
\nInciting = Provoking
\nInsolent = Rudeness, Mocking = To make fun of.
\nMocking=
\nPertinacity =Determunation.
\nPetulaent = Easily put ina bad humor
\nPlegmatic = Slow to feel emotions.
\nPiety =Devotion to God.
\nPositiveness = Affirmation
\nPrecocity = Mature than his age.
\nPresumptuous = Too high an opinion of his own ability or worthness.
\nRemoses = A feeling of sadness because you have done some thing bad. Or Bitter regrets arising from past misdeeds.
\nReproches = Blaming.
\nReverence = Deep respect.
\nRidiculus = To make fun of
\nRoving To wander with out definite direction.
\nScorn = Bitter contempts.
\nScropulous = Carefull.
\nSlander = False statement against some body with a purpose to defame the subject.
\nSneers = To smile ar some body in contempt.
\nSulky = Be in a bad temperment and express it by not talking
\nVacillation = To hesitate.
\nVeneration = To regard with deep respect.
\nVendictive = Unforgiving.
\nWicked = Immoral
\nWitty =Alert.<\/p>\n

Classification of Rubrics <\/strong>
\nFor an easy grasping of the different rubrics in the chapter we have classified symptoms into
\n1. Constitutional symptoms
\n2. Psychopathological symptoms
\n3. Emotional symptoms
\n4. Intellectual symptoms
\n5. Modalities.
\n\u00a0<\/strong>
\nEmotional \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Intellectual
\n<\/strong>Abandoned\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Absorbed,buried in thoughts
\nAbusive .\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 Abstraction of mind
\nAdmonition\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Acuteness
\nAmusement\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Answers
\nAnger\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0Antagonism
\nAnguish\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Business aversion to
\nAnticipation \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Busy, fruitless
\nAversion\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Culminate desire
\nBlood cannot looked a\u00a0 Capriciousness
\nBrooding\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Carefulness
\nCarried desire for\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Censorious
\nCautious \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Clairvoyance
\nChildren aversion to\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Concentration
\nColor aversion to\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Confidence want of
\nConscientious\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0Confounding
\nConsolation agg\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 Contemptuous
\nDespair \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Contrary
\nDiscontented\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Deedful
\nDiscouraged\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Dictatorial
\nDisgust\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Disobedience
\nDwells\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Disturbed aversion
\nEmbraced\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Dullness.
\nEnnui\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Egotism
\nEnvy\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Fanatics
\nForsaken\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0Fastidious
\nFrightened\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Flattery
\nGossiping\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0Foolish
\nGrimace\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Forgetfulness
\nHatred\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Godless
\nHaughty\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0Honor wounded
\nHeedless\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Hurry
\nHelplessness\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Hypocrisy
\nHide\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Ideas
\nHigh spirited\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Impatience
\nHome desire\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0Impetuous
\nHome sickness\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0Impulsive
\nHorrible things effect\u00a0\u00a0 Inciting others
\nImbecility \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Inconstancy
\nInconsolable\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Indifference
\nIndignation\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0Indiscretion.
\nLamenting\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0Indolence
\nLewdness\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Inquisitive
\nLoathing \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Insolent.
\nLooked\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0Introspection
\nMagnetized\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Irresolution
\nMalicious\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Irritability.
\nMesmerized\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0Libertinism
\nMildness \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0Loquacity.
\nMirth\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0Meditation
\nMoaning\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Mistakes
\nMocking\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0Mood
\nMorose\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Moral feeling want of.
\nOffended easily\u00a0\u00a0 Prostration of mind.
\nQuarrelsome\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Quick to act
\nQuiet disposition to\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Reading aversion to.
\nSensitive\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Senses acute.
\nScorn\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0 Riding in a carriage aversion to
\nSadness \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Sneers
\nRemorse.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Succeeds never
\nReproaches\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Talk
\nRepulsive mood.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Thinking
\nRevels secret in sleep. Torments every one with his complaints.
\nSadness \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 \u00a0Torpor
\nSulky\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Travel desire for
\nTimidity\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Trifles
\nUnfortunate\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Unattractive things seems
\nWeeping\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Undertakes
\nUnobserving
\nVeneration
\nWearisome
\nWeary of life
\nWill
\nWildness
\nWomen aversion to
\nWork aversion
\nWriting<\/p>\n

Modalities <\/strong>
\nClosing eyes ame
\nConversation agg
\nDarkness agg
\nDrinking after agg
\nExercises \u2013mental symptom ame by physical exercise.
\nExertion agg
\nHigh places agg
\nJoy
\nManual work
\nMoonlight
\nNarrating the complaints aggravation.
\nOccupation amel
\nRocking amel
\nRudeness ailments from.
\nScorn ailments from.
\nSexual excess mental symptoms from
\nShining
\nStories exciting agg
\nSurprise
\nTalking complaints from
\nTalk of other agg. Thinking complaints of.
\nThunder storm<\/p>\n

Important Rubrics.
\n<\/strong><\/p>\n

    \n
  1. Scolds until the lips are turned blue and eyes starring and she falls down fainting = Abusive<\/li>\n
  2. Anxiety on waking from fright full dreams = Mind– anxiety.<\/li>\n
  3. Anxiety during convulsions = Anxiety- fits<\/li>\n
  4. Must lie down with anguish =Anxiety — lying down<\/li>\n
  5. Anxiety on hearing rushing water= Anxiety- noise rushing water.<\/li>\n
  6. Anxiety made him to walk rapidly=Anxiety \u2013walking rapidly \u2013 rushes him<\/li>\n
  7. Disposed to find fault= Censorious critical<\/li>\n
  8. Avoids the sight of people = Company aversion to<\/li>\n
  9. Crazy feeling on top the head, wild feeling in head, with confusion of ideas. = Concentration<\/li>\n
  10. Losses his way in well-known street = Confusion.<\/li>\n
  11. Wraps up in fur during summer= Delirium , Roving , Fur.<\/li>\n
  12. Imagines others will observe her =Delusions \u2013 confusion.<\/li>\n
  13. Inaccurate judgment of the distance =Distance.<\/li>\n
  14. Under stands questions only after repetitions = Dullness.<\/li>\n
  15. Stammers when talking to strangers.- Excitement.<\/li>\n
  16. Swallows continues while talking = Excitement.<\/li>\n
  17. Child cannot bear to have anyone come to them = Fear approach<\/li>\n
  18. Behind him that some one is = Fear.<\/li>\n
  19. Confusion that people is observing her= Fear.<\/li>\n
  20. Likes cow dung, mud , saliva = Feaceses.<\/li>\n
  21. Feeling of isolation = Forsaken.<\/li>\n
  22. Grasp genital during spasms = Gestures.<\/li>\n
  23. Picks at bed clothes = Gestures.<\/li>\n
  24. Unmoved by apologies = Hatred.<\/li>\n
  25. Desire to do several thing at a time = Hurry.<\/li>\n
  26. \u00a0Stab his flesh with a knife which he holds = Impulsive.<\/li>\n
  27. Do not complain = Indifference.<\/li>\n
  28. Complain nothing unless questioned = Indifference.<\/li>\n
  29. Must exert self control to prevent shooting himself = Injure.<\/li>\n
  30. She will sit and break pins = Insanity.<\/li>\n
  31. Dresses in her best clothes = Insanity.<\/li>\n
  32. Insist upon saying his prayers at the tail of his horse = Insanity.<\/li>\n
  33. Makes useless purchases = Insanity.<\/li>\n
  34. Passes his feaces on floor = Insanity.<\/li>\n
  35. Crackling of news paper drives him to despair.= Irritability- noise<\/li>\n
  36. Takes every thing in bad part = Irritability.<\/li>\n
  37. Must restrain herself from self injuring= Loathing of life.<\/li>\n
  38. Changing quickly from one subject to another = Loquacity.<\/li>\n
  39. Objection to what ever was proposed = Obstinate<\/li>\n
  40. Never focus on one matter = Persist in nothing.<\/li>\n
  41. Does not recognize the relatives = Rage.<\/li>\n
  42. Tries to kill people = Rage.<\/li>\n
  43. Pulls hair of bystanders = Rage<\/li>\n
  44. Pulls his own hair = Pulls.<\/li>\n
  45. Horror of opposite sex = Religious.<\/li>\n
  46. Scratches the lime of the wall = Scratches.<\/li>\n
  47. Exposes the person = Shameless.<\/li>\n
  48. Brain cry = Shirking.<\/li>\n
  49. Knocking his head against the wall= Striking.<\/li>\n
  50. Rouse with difficulty = Stupefaction.<\/li>\n
  51. Thins that the people are talking about her.= Suspicious<\/li>\n
  52. Answers correctly when spoken to but delirium and unconsciousness return at once = Unconsciousness<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    Related rubrics which are other wise not mentioned<\/strong> ( Just to highlight that you can have many more cross reference)<\/p>\n